World Cup Tales: The Shame Of Gijon, 1982

World Cup Tales: The Shame Of Gijon, 1982

By on May 9, 2010 in History, Latest | 9 comments

Algeria make their first appearance in the World Cup finals since 1986 this year, and if they are looking for any more encouragement to perform than the prospect of playing on the world’s biggest stage, then the sense of injustice at their previous treatment by the competition could be enough to spur them on that little bit more. Algeria have previously qualified for two World Cup tournaments, but in one of those circumstances conspired against them to the extent that they may have been excused wondering whether they weren’t even wanted in the tournament in the first place. Was Algeria’s elimination from the 1982 World Cup down to “cheating” by their group rivals West Germany and Austria, though, or was the fundamental flaw in the timing of the final group matches?

Group 2, the group that contained Algeria, West Germany, Austria and Chile, was held in the Spanish cities of Gijon and Oviedo and, as was the convention at the time, the Germans, as the seeded team, played all three of their matches at the same venue, Estadio El Molinón in Gijon, while the other three nations played their matches against each other at the smaller Estadio Carlos Tartiere in Oviedo. West Germany were the second favourites to win the tournament behind Brazil and it was the first time that Algeria had qualified for the finals. There had been some disquiet in the media that the expansion of the World Cup finals from sixteen to twenty-four nations would lead to some mis-matches in the first round of the competition, but goals from Rabah Majder and Lakhdar Belloumi gave Algeria a sensational 2-1 win, while Austria beat Chile 1-0 in the second match.

In the second round of matches, a hat-trick from Karl-Heinz Rummenigge helped West Germany to a 4-1 win against Chile whilst Austria beat Algeria 2-0. All of this set up a final round of matches which meant any of three teams in the group could either qualify for the next round or be knocked out, depending on which way the results went. The first of the two matches saw Algeria play Chile, who were already eliminated from the tournament with a match left to play. Algeria stunned the Chilean team by racing into a 3-0 lead with ten minutes left to play of the first half, and although Chile fought back in the second half, Algeria clung on to win by three goals to two.

This set up a final match between West Germany and Austria in extraordinary circumstances. A one or two goal win for West Germany would see both teams through to the second round of the competition. Any more than this and Austria would be eliminated on goals scored or goal difference. A win or a draw for Austria would knock West Germany out in the first round of the competition. There was, however, reason to believe that Austria would go hell for leather to knock the West Germans out of the competition. The rivalry between Germany and Austria is one of the longest-standing in European football, going back as far as 1908 (Germany played their first match in 1908 against Switzerland, but played their second and third international matches against Austria), and in the previous tournament in Argentina four years earlier, a thrilling 3-2 win for Austria in Cordoba had knocked West Germany out of the competition.

To say that there was to be no repeat of Cordoba in Gijon four years later, though, would be something of an understatement. From the kick-off, West Germany threw everybody forward and took the lead after eleven minutes Horst Hrubesch headed in at the near post to give them the lead. After this, however, everybody shut up shop and the match degenerated into seventy-nine minutes of lazily passing the ball around the two defences and backpasses to the two goalkeepers. Inside the stadium, the Spanish crowd chanted, “Fuera, fuera” (“Out, out”) at the players, whilst Algerian supporters waved bank notes at the players and one German supporter burned his flag. Television commentators covering the match worldwide, including Hugh Johns for ITV in Britain, condemned what was taking place in front of them. So explicit was what was unfolding before them that even the German television commentator offered perhaps the most damning indictment of the spectacle of all:

What’s happening here is disgraceful and has nothing to do with football. You can say what you want, but not every end justifies the means.

The West German squad didn’t exactly help themselves in their post-match interviews. Their coach, Jupp Derwall, noted that, “We wanted to progress, not play football”, while Lothar Matthäus stated that, “We have gone through. That’s all that counts”. This, however, was not how much of the rest of the world perceived what had happened. The German press was furious – “Shame On You!”, read the headline of Bild, the biggest selling tabloid newspaper in the country, whilst Willi Schulz, a former German international defender, called the players “gangsters” in his popular newspaper column. There were also loud and angry protests in Algiers at the perceived injustice.

FIFA announced that they couldnt reverse or annul the result, and that they couldn’t change the schedule of matches for the remainder of the 1982 tournament. From 1986 on, however, the final round of group matches would be played simultaneously to minimise the risk of such events taking place again. The match became known as “Nichtangriffspakt von Gijón” (“Non-aggression pact of Gijón”) or “Schande von Gijón” (“Shame of Gijón”) in West Germany and one Spanish newspaper, hinting at something far darker, described the match as “El Anschluss”, referring to the unification of Austria and Germany under Hitler’s rule in 1938. Whilst such a comparison, with all that it insinuates, is a fairly reprehensible one, the German team further undermined its own popularity in the semi-final of the competition against France, when goalkeeper Harald Schumacher almost took Patrick Battiston’s head clean off its shoulders and later remarked, when he found out that Battiston had lost two teeth as a result of his tackle, commented that, “There’s no compassion amongst professionals. Tell him I’ll pay for the crowns”.

The Shame of Gijón and Schumacher’s foul on Battiston inadvertently drew up a fault line within German football between the old and the new. German football had been founded on amateur principles and this had led to the late development of the club game in the country and a distrust of the “win at all costs” mentality of the 1982 team. Their performance and behaviour at the 1982 World Cup finals turned off a lot of young German supporters, and this ambivalence towards the national team lasted for a long time. Was the Shame of Gijón entirely the fault of the German and Austrian teams, though? The “win at all costs” mentality was well established in professional football by 1982, so why did it take this to happen for FIFA ensure that final group matches to take place simultaneously? In some respects, the biggest surprise about the affair is that it took so long for this to happen, and the fact that it happened between West Germany and Austria was probably a coincidence rather than anything else. It has certainly never been suggested that the two teams had a formal pre-match agreement over the result of the match or that any money changed hands between them. The most likely explanation is an unspoken agreement – the two teams both realised that they risked their own elimination if they went at full pelt and chose not to take any chances.

None of this, though, meant much to the Algerians, who were robbed of a place in the second round of the World Cup in their tournament finals debut by what was, whether intentional or not, a stitch-up by the West German and Austrian teams. Algeria qualified for the finals of the World Cup again in 1986 but, after a promising 1-1 draw with Northern Ireland and a spirited display against Brazil in their second match in which they held out for sixty-six minutes before losing 1-0. They were finally knocked out and finished in bottom place in group after a 3-0 defeat in their final match against Spain. This year sees them return to the finals, in the same group as England, the United States and Slovenia. Should they get through this group, their second round match would be against the winners or runners-up of the group containing… Germany. England and the USA will start as the favourites to qualify from their group, but Algerian supporters may well be of the opinion that revenge is a dish best served cold, and that twenty-eight years is plenty long enough to wait.

Share Button

    9 Comments

  1. The timing of the group game matches generated controversy for a long time – a certain Argentina/Peru match comes to mind, of course including an Argentine-born Peruvian goalie.

    Great story!

    Elliott

    May 10, 2010

  2. What was especially unforgivable about Argentina/Peru in 1978 is that the first-round Group matches & some of the second-round group matches WERE played simultaneously, just not the Brazil & Argentina matches. I remember Scotland losing to Peru while Holland were thrashing Iran, & the Holland-Italy & West Germany-Austria matches were also played at the same time.

    In fact, one of the reasons the Germans conceded the late winner to the Austrians was because they found out that Holland were beating Italy & so realised they couldn’t get through to the Final & didn’t want to be bothered with the 3rd/4th Place Play-Off. After the match, the Austrian manager even criticised the Germans for easing up & therefore blemishing the last match in charge of the German team of Helmut Schoen, who been the manager for 16 years.

    Obviously, as all this happened in 1978, it should have been predictable that it could happen in 1982 as well. FIFA didn’t think lightning could strike twice!

    Roy Ebsary

    May 10, 2010

  3. Estadio El Molinón in Gijon

    Ah, if you’re going to have the accent in Molinón you’ll want one in Gijón too.

    ejh

    May 11, 2010

  4. I was in Nigeria during the 1982 World Cup & the consensus over there was that two European countries had cynically conspired to screw Africa again (with all the colonial baggage that implies). We shrugged our collective shoulders – some things will never change.

    Time’s mellowed my views since then. And I’d say now, “OK, you already know FIFA doesn’t want Algeria-Peru or some other one-hit wonder as its showcase tournament final. But you didn’t win or tie your game against Austria. The blame lies nowhere else.”

    sunil

    May 12, 2010

  5. i’m a collector of old games on dvd and i watched the full recording of this one, with spanish commentary, a few weeks back.

    it’s not accurate to say that “everybody shut up shop and the match degenerated into seventy-nine minutes of lazily passing the ball around the two defences and backpasses to the two goalkeepers”. the majority of the first half was competitive. west germany made all the running and should have scored a couple more goals in the first 20 minutes, including a reflex header from breitner which clipped the top of the bar at 0-0. austria didn’t seem interested in attacking but the germans did have their moments.

    for the opening half-hour, the midfield was crowded and combative, with players throwing themselves into tackles. in other words, it was a reasonably normal game up to this point. after about 35 minutes, though, things visibly seemed to slow down, and not much goalmouth incident took place for the remainder of the first half. but this wasn’t anything out of the ordinary, and there were still a number of fiercely-contested 50/50 balls in midfield.

    but the second half was another story entirely. nothing happened at all, and around the 50-minute mark, mass whistling could be heard from the crowd. the tv director cut away from the play and panned around the stadium to show everyone on their feet, jeering and waving the white handkerchiefs.

    it was without question a stitch-up, but to say that nothing whatsoever happened in the game after hrubesch’s goal is not true. the next 20-25 minutes were vaguely watchable, a lot of full-blooded challenges were flying in for the entirety of the first half, and the germans were definitely trying to grab a second goal during that period.

    by the way, anyone reading this is advised to get hold of a dvd of algeria v chile if they can, which was a fantastically entertaining match.

    jonathan

    May 15, 2010

  6. “[It] was, whether intentional or not, a stitch-up by the West German and Austrian teams.”
    I’m moving to Germany in the next fortnight where I’ll be teaching philosophy, yet I just can’t my head around what might constitute an unintentional stitch-up…

    Keir

    June 23, 2010

  7. Keir- I suspect he meant “premeditated” rather than “intentional”.

    Jonathan- thanks for the account! Appreciated!

    Ragnar

    June 23, 2010

  8. I don’t think it’s got anything to do with you Sunil. Nigeria is a nothing country that has no right to critise it’s superior nations, who you all look up to and try and emulate.

    Thomas Nutkins-Smythe

    March 30, 2011

  9. Hey Jonathan I am also a collector. Where do you collect the old games. Do you get them in English commentary? I am trying to get some old games but most I get now are in Spanish commentary instead of English.

    Don

    November 20, 2013

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Algeria, Germany, Austria: The Shame of Gijon 1982 | Must Read Soccer - [...] since 1986 brings back memories of one of the most shameful episodes of soccer history — the non-football that …
  2. A World Cup Miscellany: Group C | Pitch Invasion - [...] did invent the game, after all, and the Algerians certainly deserve some recompense for “The Shame of Gijon” (the …
  3. Whiteside Can't Jump: the Northern Ireland national football team » España 82: Spain 0-1 Northern Ireland - [...] Spain progressed despite losing to Northern Ireland. The match wasn’t quite played to the same pedestrian levels as West …

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>