The 2010/11 Premier League Previews 1 – Arsenal: How Long Is Too Long?

11 By Ian  |   The Ball  |   July 27, 2010  |     11

It’s that time of the season again, and we have time this year for a pre-season piece on all twenty of the clubs in this season’s Premier League. First of all, since we’re doing this in alphabetical order, Arsenal, where the big question over the next nine months may turn out to be what they can do to end their run without a trophy and how long supporters’ patience with M. Wenger will last.

Perhaps the perpetual Champions League football of the last five years has had something of an anaesthetic effect. Perhaps everyone at Arsenal is still basking in the sheer luxuriousness of The Emirates Stadium. Perhaps, just perhaps, they’re just very good at keeping their apprehension quiet. It has, however, now been five seasons since Arsenal last won a major trophy and, however sumptuous their new surroundings may be, they have yet to christen it with some silverware. On the surface, though, 2010/11 has half a chance of being their season. The Champions League Four was finally broken up last season, but Arsenal weren’t, as many people had supposed they would be when the hegemony which defined the first decade of this century in English football finally cracked, the fall guys. That dubious “honour” fell, of course, to Liverpool instead and Arsenal will benefit from Champions League money again this season.

The Premier League, in spite of the near-constant squawking of the press, has had a quiet summer in the transfer market. Indeed, Arsenal’s most talked about involvement in it at the time of writing has been in fending off the overtures being hurled in the direction of Cesc Fabregas from Barcelona. In this respect, Barca are following a well worn trail in terms of the behaviour of the Spanish giants in the transfer market with what looks very much like an orchestrated, pre-meditated attack from all sides. The Spanish press have been writing stories that seem deliberately scripted to unsettle the player, and even Barcelona players have started getting involved with, for example, Xavi stating that:

If we don’t manage to get his signature this season then Arsenal only really have him on loan for a year – because there is nothing they can do to stop him joining next summer. Arsenal need to understand that they are only delaying the inevitable.

Xavi is not the only one doing it, either. We know that this sort of thing has become the modus operandi of Spanish clubs (and it’ll be a cold day in hell before this site tries to claim any sort of moral superiority on behalf of the Premier League), but it at least felt natural coming from Real Madrid. Barcelona have even more or less publicly acknowledged they are behaving like this and, for a club has a tendency to at least be perceived to assume a place somewhere near the top of the moral high ground, this whole tawdry game of kiss chase leaves a somewhat sour taste in the mouth.

Still, Fabregas remains, for the time being, an Arsenal player. The same cannot be said for Eduardo da Silva, who left for Shakhtar Donetsk a couple of weeks ago, though he doesn’t seem to have been the same player since returning from his broken leg, or William Gallas, who left as a free agent at the end of last season but has yet to secure himself a new contract anywhere. There is also talk that Tomas Rosicky, who has not completely lived up to his billing since signing for the club, could also be on his way. At present, only the Moroccan striker Marouane Chamakh and the French defender Laurent Koscielny defender have arrived at the club. We can only assume at this point that further new signings will arrive before the start of the season.

Yet what may trouble Arsenal supporters the most in the build-up to the start of the new season is that one of the key positions on the pitch, that of the goalkeeper, still hasn’t really been successfully filled. Goalkeepers have long given the impression of being Arsene Wenger’s blind spot. Arsenal suffered somewhat last season for the shortcomings of Lukas Fabianski and Manuel Almunia and, while Almunia seems likely to be frozen out or sold during the summer, the calibre of replacements that Arsenal are currently being linked with – Mark Schwarzer, for example, was according to some reports the subject of a £3m offer earlier this summer, which seems somewhat crazy for a 37 year-old – don’t sound like Premier League or Champions League winning goalkeepers.

In other positions, unless experienced (and no doubt expensive) replacements can be found for those that are (or may be) departing, much will depend on younger players such as Emmanuel Frimpong, Aaron Ramsey, Theo Walcott and Jack Wilshere. Wilshere in particular showed promise during his spell on loan at Bolton Wanderers last season and pre-season sightings of him thus far have been said to be encouraging. The one thing that these players have on their side is that their manager is remains probably the best in the business at bringing through youngsters. Expectations of them will be high, but Wenger remains a master at keeping the potential runaway egos of young players firmly on the ground. It may be too soon for them. It may not. And herein lies the inner debate for Arsenal supporters.

Five years is a long time without a trophy. We could say that a club of Arsenal’s dimensions has some degree of a reasonable expectation of success, although the philosophical questions that such a statement implies are numerous. There were some mumblings of disquiet regarding Arsene Wenger’s stewardship last season and, though it remains unlikely that he would leave the club this season, the question has to be asked of how long such patience, both in the stands and in the directors box, will last. The Premier League and the Champions League may prove to beyond them this season, but the FA Cup or the League Cup would at least mark a return to winning ways. Still, Arsenal remain on a firm financial footing while Manchester City continue to throw money on the wages and transfer fees bonfire and the ownership of Manchester United and Liverpool remain sources of something approaching civil war at both clubs. Perhaps the long game will pay off for Arsenal but, in a world in which instant gratification has become the norm, for how long will this patience continue?



Ian began writing Twohundredpercent in May 2006. He lives in Brighton. He has also written for, amongst others, Pitch Invasion, FC Business Magazine, The Score, When Saturday Comes, Stand Against Modern Football and The Football Supporter. Ian was the first winner of the Socrates Award For Not Being Dead Yet at the 2010 NOPA awards for football bloggers.

  • July 27, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    dollar mighty

    5 years is long enough,but as every season passes and we continue with this policy,5 years will turn into 10 and so on,next season we will definitely fall out the top 4,wenger doing it on the cheap will finally catch up with us,also he refuses to sign a goal keeper,a problem which he has let slip for far to long now and then there is the defensive issue he also overlooks,untill we sort the way we defend out we will continue to fail,plus having vermaelen at the back doesn’t help.

  • July 27, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    Matthew Montgomery

    While I largely agree with your analysis — I am particularly enamoured with the Arsenal — you are a bit wide of the mark when discussing the celebration actions of Cesc Fabregas with Spain and the “wearing” of a Barcelona kit. While many headlines shouted about Fabregas wearing a Barca kit, these were largely nonsensical, alarmist garbage: The kit was put on Fabregas, then he took it off. Video evidence supports this position, while the popular position portrayed by some sections of the media is considerably different. It’s troubling to see you succumbing to the headlines, as I believe your coverage is generally of some real quality.

  • July 27, 2010 at 10:48 pm


    I will be straight with you Matthew, I only saw a picture and not the video (time constraints, you know), but I’m happy to check it and amend it once I’ve seen it.

  • July 27, 2010 at 10:51 pm


    (I’m happy to change that part of it, having checked it out).

  • July 28, 2010 at 8:05 am


    @Dollar Mighty I was under the impression that Arsenal fans were quite pleased with Vermaelen.

  • July 28, 2010 at 10:27 am


    I happened to be in a TV room full of Spaniards on a campsite near Catalonia when the shirt incident occurred. Everybody cheered. I’ve subsequently been delighted to see it apparently rebounding on the arrogant so-and-sos.

  • July 28, 2010 at 12:10 pm


    Short answer as to how long they should wait? As long as it takes. The fact that Arsenal have held on to a top four place while still remaining competitive in Europe is achievement enough over five years that has seen their spending strangled.

    The hoary old chestnut that if they don’t win anything their best players will go is frankly rubbish. If Arsenal won the Champions League and Premier League titles next year it wouldn’t stop the billionaire clubs blundering the squad and offering ridiculous sums/contracts for their services – in fact it’s even more likely.

    Arsenal are coming out of a period of austerity just as many clubs (including Man United) are about to enter theirs. This won’t mean they can lay waste to all who oppose: they’re still in a situation where they can’t compete with the loss-leading super rich clubs for players.

    Any Arsenal fan who thinks that the club can buy their way to success is horrifically deluded.

  • July 28, 2010 at 1:01 pm


    The goalkeeping position is crucial as both Fabianski and Almunia are quite clearly not good enough. Signing Schwartzer – an average keeper at best and his average standard is slipping – would be a waste of time. Perhaps time to spend some money on Joe Hart who wouldn’t want to sit around waiting for Shay Given to retire.

  • July 28, 2010 at 6:52 pm

    The 2010/11 Premier League Previews 1 – Arsenal: How Long Is Too Long? « Scissors Kick

    […] The 2010/11 Premier League Previews 1 – Arsenal: How Long Is Too Long? “It’s that time of the season again, and we have time this year for a pre-season piece on all twenty of the clubs in this season’s Premier League. First of all, since we’re doing this in alphabetical order, Arsenal, where the big question over the next nine months may turn out to be what they can do to end their run without a trophy and how long supporters’ patience with M. Wenger will last.” (twohundredpercent) […]

  • July 28, 2010 at 8:26 pm

    David Howell

    Totally agreed on Joe Hart, and it would be the best thing to happen to the England team in years if Arsenal signed him. But that’s another argument…

    Arsenal have been the top sustainably-run club in the league in every single one of their ‘barren’ seasons. Is that enough? I suspect the corporate fans would disagree, but some of those will be from industries who wrote the book on how to spend beyond one’s means and get away with it… as Graham said, Arsenal’s age of austerity is ending and all of their rivals are about to enter their own. Since about 2008, I’ve predicted that this decade will produce an Arsenal dynasty to rival that of Manchester United in the last decade, and I stand by that. I don’t think it will start this season, though – I think it will start when the Financial Fair Play regulations come in and instantly tears apart the business models of every club who can even begin to compete with Arsenal at this time (save possibly Chelsea if they can circumvent it well enough, which I seem to recall from this site is something they’re going to pull off).

    Arsenal are playing the long game brilliantly, and Wenger may well be remembered for decades to come as the greatest financial manager in English football history. In the short run, goalkeeper is definitely the place to invest – and invest significantly, seeing as it is not only the most glaring weakness at the club but the cheapest position to address. I would even go as far as to say that if Arsenal sold Fabregas and bought Hart – at what I would imagine would be a net £30m-ish profit – they would be none the worse on the field.

  • August 25, 2010 at 5:30 am


    The commentators who bemoan and harp on about Arsenal being trophyless need to get things in perspective. The premiership is basically reserved for either Man U or Chelsea with Man City now looming large. These clubs have the finanance to buy the best players and Management teams. Arsenal are a success because they have made the European Cup group stage for ten years. This is the most that can be achieved without going into substantial debt. For many of those years they lacked the ground capacity to match the others. The majority of the clubs in the EPL are also ‘trophyless’ don’t let lazy journalists keep on repeating this nonsense about Arsenal being unsuccesful.


Leave A Comment

Also available on…
Speek Yo Branes
Socialise With Us