Uncomfortable Questions For Chester

3 By Ian  |   The Ball  |   July 12, 2010  |     16

After the insults from almost all quarters and months of hard work, Chester FC, the club borne from the ashes of the Vaughan family’s disastrous spell in charge of Chester City, will start the forthcoming season in Division One of the Evo-Stick (formerly the Unibond) League. Amongst the goodwill, good intentions and idealism of the new club, an uglier side to the new club reared its head during their first ever match, a pre-season friendly at Colwyn Bay last Saturday. Outbreaks of trouble throughout the day resulted in damage being caused to the Colwyn Bay ground, and the trouble was sufficient for their next match, another friendly match against Rhyl, who were demoted from the Welsh Premier League into the Cyrmu Alliance earlier this summer, to be cancelled as well.

The specifics of what happened at Llanelian Road on Saturday are, largely, neither here nor there. Talk on the club’s forum has ranged from a handful of people drinking too much to the police over-reacting to a situation that could have been otherwise avoiding, but blanket denials that there was a significant problem at the match have fallen upon deaf ears.  There were around 1,500 Chester supporters at the match on Saturday, and the uppermost estimate of the number of people that were involved in any trouble seems to be around twenty to thirty individuals. The fact of the matter is, however, that it is not acceptable to try and sweep the issue under the carpet by trotting out the old lines of it “only being a tiny minority” that “couldn’t handle their drink”, because, ultimately, all supporters of Chester FC will be tarred by this brush.

It seems likely that it will take time for some supporters to get used to the culture of non-league football. At the level at which they will be playing this season, the freedom to have a drink before, after (or, if the match is bad enough, during) the match is taken as a given. They will have to get used to that, and if they cannot weed out the troublemakers immediately (because we obviously don’t know at this moment in time whether this was a one-off or a sign of things to come), then they will have to self-police. They will be big fish in a small pool next season, and it is likely that local neanderthals that fancy a pop at a “big” club coming to town. There will likely be further provocation throughout the course of the coming seaason. They can either choose to see the reputation of their club getting dragged through the mud, or they can do as much as they can to nip this potential problem in the bud now.

A large amount of goodwill was thrown in the direction of this new club from other supporter-owned clubs and, indeed, from the local council that gave them the lease on The Deva Stadium. There is still absolutely no doubt about the motives of those that are running it or the overwhelming majority of its supporters, but these supporters have an important decision to make. Do they wish to revel in the “no-one likes us, we don’t care” culture that some trouble-makers choose to take refuge in, or do they wish to reflect a positive image of their club to build the relationships with the community that the people running their club are desperate to? One would suspect that the overwhelming majority of them would prefer the latter, but this requires a zero tolerance attitude towards trouble from all of the club’s owners, and not just from those that are carrying out the day-to-day running of The Deva Stadium.

It is, frankly, not good enough to make any justifications for what happened on Saturday. Blaming a “tiny minority” or “police overreaction” are canards, nothing more than nothing less, and falling back old favourites such as these or getting caught up in precise who-did-what-to-whoms are no use to anybody except for those that cause trouble and then, once they have sobered up, are seeking to justify their behaviour. The massive majority of Chester supporters are already paying the price for last weekend’s behaviour by having to miss out on a match this weekend, and the cancellation of the match against Rhyl is probably a good thing, on balance. Considering what happened at Colwyn Bay, the police were really left with little alternative.

Not, it is likely, that many of those that were involved in what did go on last weekend will be likely to be that bothered by any of the above. The biggest pity about all of this is that the people that put the most work into the club, those that fought tooth and nail to get it going and to secure the future of Chester FC, those that give up their time to ensure that there is a club there for people to turn up at and watch, are those that will suffer the most. They will be the most embarrassed and will have the most apologising to do (both publicly, through the media, and privately, to Colwyn Bay FC itself). Perhaps stewarding their own supporters at away matches will be the answer to this problem. Ultimately, Chester’s supporters are the owners of their club and they still have a bright future. They just need to nip this problem in the bud rather than allowing this unfortunate incident to become the defining feature of their club’s rebirth. It’s their call.



Ian began writing Twohundredpercent in May 2006. He lives in Brighton. He has also written for, amongst others, Pitch Invasion, FC Business Magazine, The Score, When Saturday Comes, Stand Against Modern Football and The Football Supporter. Ian was the first winner of the Socrates Award For Not Being Dead Yet at the 2010 NOPA awards for football bloggers.

  • July 13, 2010 at 7:20 am

    Stuart Fuller

    This is not an isolated problem. The number of games at the non-league now being affected by crowd problems is growing by the season. Some of this is down to fans simply being “priced out” of the Premier League/Football League, others by the ease to which they can gain notorious status.

    Young football fans simply follow fashion, so if they see others doing it, then so they follow.

    Many clubs at Step 2 and below of the pyramid still allow alcohol to be drunk on the terraces and this passes off in 99.99% of the time without an issue. Interestingly enough the two high profile incidents last season came on the same weekend, namely Boreham Wood v Kingstonians, and Luton Town v York City – both games where alcohol sales were restricted to consumption in the bars.

  • July 13, 2010 at 8:56 am


    As an AFC Wimbledon fan we have been subjected to the local neanderthals at odd games throughout the last 8 years. They sometimes don’t even bother getting as far as the ground, merely trying it on with any fans who happen to be in a pub somewhere between a railway station and the ground.
    Chester will have to get used to this – the chances of this happening can be reduced by contact with the other club and police on arrangements. It will be impossible to avoid completely though.

    Drinking on the terraces,as any Wimbledon fan will testify can exacerbate the problem – just ask anyone who has watched a game at Bromley……. but a few games have been watched with beer available during the game that have passed off with zero incidents.

  • July 13, 2010 at 10:14 am


    When it comes to problems at the games of reborn clubs it is interesting to note that there have never been any problems at AFC Wimbledon home games, only the odd away one where the hosting club was too naive, ignorant or just plain greedy to make adequate security arrangements for a larger than normal attendance.

    It seems such “phoenix” clubs attract their share of local trouble-makers (often those banned from bigger clubs and League grounds) “support” their local non-league club for the day mainly to see Wimbledon lose.

    Chester fans will just have to get used to this sort of thing and self-police their own idiots as well as possible.

Leave A Comment

Also available on…
Socialise With Us