The 200% Podcast 13: FOUL!
The Power Of Discretion And Why Guidelines Are… King
Steven Gerrard, The Media & Liverpool’s Structural Issues
The Twohundredpercent Podcast LIVE!
Where, Exactly, Do Queens Park Rangers Go From Here?
End Of Season Ennui
The 200% Podcast 12 – General Election Special
Saturday Night On Channel Five For The Football League
The Decline & Fall Of Leyton Orient
Rape, Disrespect & Fury: The Oyston Family & Blackpool FC
Is It Time For A New Football Club For Newcastle?
Tranmere Rovers & Cheltenham Town Stare Into The Abyss
Many of you will already be aware of the concept of “jumping the shark”. Named for an episode of “Happy Days” in which The Fonz jumped over a shark on a pair of water skis, it has come to signify a step too far. A metaphorical line which has been overstepped. Today, as you may have heard, the Premier League jumped the shark. I have been pondering over the last few weeks whether the Premier League has been orchestrating recent shenanigans for our entertainment. The low comedy of Newcastle United and the slowly building crisis at Anfield seem to have been tailor-made for cynics such as me, but I was, I have to say, caught somewhat by surprise by this. It’s an announcement so staggering in its avarice that it has taken most of the afternoon for me to fully absorb it. It’s brilliant.
For those of you that hadn’t already found this out, the Premier League wants to play matches abroad. It doesn’t end there. They plan to extend the season by one match (to thirty-nine matches) and have every club play one match abroad in January, starting in January 2011. As if that’s not enough, the plan is for them to auction off the rights to host two matches each to five different cities, with two matches to be played in each city over the same weekend. Brilliant! This is the moment at which the Emperor’s new clothes have finally vanished from view. It is the point at which any pretence of caring about anything other than money suddenly vaporises. It is the point at which the Premier League finally says to fans of clubs in its own home country that you don’t matter any more. It’s not about you. It’s about the global dollar, and nothing is going to get in the way of it. Consider, if you will, this magnificent quote from Peter Scudamore, the Premier League’s Chief Executive:
“We believe that an ‘international round’ of matches will enhance the strength of the Barclays Premier League as a competition; create extra interest in all 20 Premier League Clubs at home and abroad; and allow increased investment in talent development and acquisition, facilities as well as our football development and community programmes.”
Yes, Peter. These will be the “football development and community programmes” that have left the England football team without one single international class goalkeeper then, I presume. I’m also interested in how this creates “extra interest in all 20 Premier League clubs at home”. Isn’t there enough already? If there isn’t, there’s a reason for that. It’s because there never will be. You could build one stadium with a capacity of fifty million people and put the entire population of Britain in it with Sky Sports being broadcast on the palms of their hands and it wouldn’t be “enough”, because once you start pursuing money and money alone, enough is never “enough”. They’re fooling no-one. Everyone knows what this is about. The Fonz has done his trick and he’s already back at Arnold’s, drying himself off, whilst enjoying a root beer and a cheeseburger.
For the purposes of argument, though, let’s take a moment to consider the details of the proposition. Clubs will be seeded, so that no one city hogs all of the “big” clubs. This still, however, causes a massive degree of lop-sidedness in the fixture list. Using this season’s table as an example, someone would have to play Manchester United or Arsenal three times, whilst someone would have to play Derby County three times. Imagine being relegated on goal difference at the end of the season, knowing that your team had played Manchester United three times, while the team just above you had played, say, Portsmouth three times and beaten them in Shanghai the previous January. Would you be any happier, knowing that at least the directors of your club were £10m better off? Thought not. Imagine, if you will, being an inhabitant of, say, Los Angeles, bidding an enormous amount of money on two Premier League matches and ending up with Bolton Wanderers vs Reading and Manchester City vs Fulham. If we assume that The Big Four are separated, how many of the other six matches are going to sell out a 50,000 capacity stadium? It could even prove to be counter-productive. Having been fed a televised diet of Rooney and Ronaldo, how will the residents of, say, Tokyo react to seeing Manchester City and Newcastle United bore the hell out of everyone for ninety minutes? They may never see the league in the same light again.
When the NFL played its exhibition match at Wembley at the end of last year, a conference was held for Premier League clubs on how to market themselves abroad. The clubs appear to have left it high on a mixture of champagne bubbles and talk of big, big money, and this scheme is its logical upshot. The hubris, the self-importance and the greed of modern football are all present and correct. One of its first vocal supporters has been David Gold of Birmingham City, who seems blissfully unaware of the fact that Birmingham might well not even be in the Premier League by 2011 when he says, “We are making history. The Premier League, which is the greatest league the world has ever known, is being adventurous. It is looking forward and is looking to take an English brand global. The idea is very worthy of consideration. I find this amazingly exciting”. In fact, in calling the Premier League “the greatest league the world has ever known”, his lack of self-awareness is almost mesmerising.
The Football Supporters Federation have issued an understandably robust criticism of the idea, and one would like to think that the FA and the media would have a thing or two say about it. Don’t go holding your breath waiting for it, though. The FA’s initial statement on the matter has been unsurprisingly weak-kneed, and we can expect little more opposition from the press. Where do you think this statement might come from?
“The growth of the Premier League has been impressive in the last 15 years thanks to the sale of television rights in this country, but now the market in the United Kingdom is becoming saturated and it is the overseas market which is now the big target area. This is a chance for the Premier League to showcase its product around the world. Some fans may feel aggrieved, but their concerns will be outweighed in the eyes of the clubs by the financial advantages. The clubs will see this as a chance to make more money so they can invest in new facilities and better players. It will be like cities bidding for the Olympic Games or the World Cup”
Peter Scudamore? David Gold? Wrong. It comes from Mihir Bose, the BBC Sports Editor – a man who, if he can’t offer any more of a robust critique of such a transparently money-orientated, non-sporting proposal, should probably be relieved of his position with immediate effect and moved to their “Business” section instead. Supporters of Premier League clubs, about whose interests very little (as ever) is being said, should surely now, if they weren’t before, be wondering why they bother. The Premier League seems intent on fulfilling what it regards as its “destiny” to become a wandering, global circus. For the average English supporter of a Premier League football club, though, the message is a stark one. The fact of the matter is this – your money and your support simply aren’t enough any more. It has been coming for some time, with the renaming of the Premiership as the Premier League to align with the fact that the league is called the “English Premier League” abroad and the reorganisation of kick-off times on Saturdays to better suit Far East and American TV audiences (in case you’d been wondering why two live matches are scheduled at lunchtime and tea-time every week, that’s the reason). For the domestic audience, this might just turn out to be the straw that broke the camel’s back for a good many Premier League supporters, and that, in turn, could be the best thing to happen for lower division football in England for years.
Ian began writing Twohundredpercent in May 2006. He lives in Brighton. He has also written for, amongst others, Pitch Invasion, FC Business Magazine, The Score, When Saturday Comes, Stand Against Modern Football and The Football Supporter. Ian was the first winner of the Socrates Award For Not Being Dead Yet at the 2010 NOPA awards for football bloggers.
Look, the Premier League is all about making money as is right now. The day they “jumped the shark” was when they sold their soul to Rupert Murdoch. Playing a round overseas does not change this fact.
If you are so disgusted about the greed of the Premier League, go watch the Conference South. Teams like St. Albans City and Havant & Waterlooville will never play home games in China.
BTW, I am an American Sunderland fan. If they played a game near where I lived, I would love to go. However, I think this idea is stupid.
This is, without question, the single stupidest idea relating to football – nay, sport – I have ever heard. However, I am, like you, watching from a calm and amused distance. The purist in me screams blue murder, of course. However, I can’t help feel that it might benefit football fans in this country in the long run.
The sooner these wretched PLCs become a wandering global circus the better. Let’s go further. Let’s make all the Premiership teams who support this just go on the road permanently like the Harlem Globetrotters. It can’t possibly weaken the league to be rid of any club who would honestly consider playing each other on a jolly Seoul to be a legitimate exercise towards winning their national championship.
It might let football fans in this country be able to get back to paying reasonable sums to watch teams and players who actually care, competing for a League Championship trophy that genuinely means something.
“If you are so disgusted about the greed of the Premier League, go watch the Conference South. Teams like St. Albans City and Havant & Waterlooville will never play home games in China.”
This is exactly what I do. As a matter of fact, I went to my first match at the palatial Clarence Park (the home, if you didn’t know this already, of St Albans City) in September 1982, and was a regular there until 2006, when moving to Brighton made travelling there every other Saturday impractical. To the extent that I go anywhere “regularly” at the moment, it’s Worthing (Ryman League Division One South), Lewes (Conference South) or, at a push, AFC Wimbledon (Ryman League Premier Division).
Broadly speaking, I’m not angry with the Premier League over this, except on behalf of the people that have been the life-blood of their clubs for the last 120 years or so – their own supporters. I agree what the Premier League was always about making money (a line that can be drawn back to clubs setting up holding companies to bypass FA rules which were meant to prevent club directors from profiting from their directorship in the 1980s).
As I said in the penultimate sentence of this post, “it might just turn out to be the best thing possible for lower division football” in England (I’ll edit the post to add “in England” to it). If I was a football supporter in one of the cities thinking of bidding, I’d be wondering why these millions of pounds couldn’t be putting into improving the football infrastructure in those cities, rather than on hosting a couple of exhibition matches. And that’s a rhetorical question, by the way.
Can you imagine what the people New York/Mumbai/Beijing are going to make of naked premier league football un-mediated by over-hyped TV coverage?
They’ll take one look at it demand their money back. The Premier League/nay English football’s name will be mud, the clubs will be told to f**k off and never come back. Hopefully a financial implosion will follow and, as Dotmund rightly says, we can go back to watching football at football grounds.
This, Duffman, has been my experience of the Premier League. On the rare occasions that I have ventured to White Hart Lane over the last ten years or so, I have been uniformly disappointed by what I’ve seen. It looks mighty different live, compared to what it looks like on the television.
Whatever happened to “our players are playing far too many games as it is”?
Half the Premier League refuse to enter a full strength side in the FA cup because they think their teams will be overworked.
It’ll all come down to a decision of whether we should send our best team on a trip around the world for a league game that will leave them jet-lagged, or should we send an under-strength side, keeping our best for the other league and cup games in January…
Following on from this, will Chamions League fixtures be taking place throughout the solar system in future seasons? I personally would pay handsomely for a ticket to see Galatasaray Vs Shalke on Neptune.
My views HERE
In short, this could backfire big time on the PL. If many more disillusioned fans start deserting games three quarters of their matches will be played in half empty stadiums or worse. And with no fans making no atmosphere how exciting does a match seem then to a tv audience ? (Try watching a game with the sound of and see if you last more than 10 minutes). No fans=no atmosphere=no excitement= pretty shit product to try and sell to tv companies around the world.
POP – was that a bubble bursting?