Manchester United & The Need For Permanent Success

10 By Ian  |   The Ball  |   January 4, 2010  |     8

Second placed in the Premier League, in the semi-finals of the League Cup and in the last sixteen of the Champions League may not seem like too bad a place to be at the start of January, but questions are now starting to be asked about what is going on at Manchester United, both on and off the pitch. What is worth remembering, however, is that there is an intrinsic link between the two. How well Manchester United do on the pitch is in no small part determined by how well they are doing off it and the long term stability of the club is guided by a greater and greater requirement of success on the pitch.

On the pitch, Manchester United have been looking shakier than they have done for some years for much of the season. In this respect, a home defeat in the FA Cup by Leeds United is more than just a cough or a splutter. It is a symptom of a fragility that has been visible in many of their other matches this season, including matches that they have won. They have been fortunate that the other more plutocratic Premier League clubs have also stuttered this season. Chelsea, for example, might have been runaway leaders this season were it not for the fact that they have won just five of their ten away league matches this season. Arsenal have lost four matches (compared to six in the whole of last season) and will go second if they win their game in hand over Manchester United. The less said about Liverpool’s season, the better. With six defeats already this season compared to two over the whole of last season, their collapse has masked some of the problems at other Premier League clubs.

To an extent, of course, some of their problems have been beyond their control. Their injury list has been horrific, but this often shown up gaps in the depth of the squad. Sunday’s defeat was a decent reference point. Alex Ferguson had certainly made changes from the previous week’s win again Wigan Athletic, but this wasn’t a Manchester United team made up of youth team players. The tough question that Ferguson may be having to ask himself this week is this: are the likes of Gabriel Obertana, Danny Welbeck, Jonathan Evans and Fabio da Silva really good enough to bolster the team in a second half of the season that will be more difficult than the first half of it was?

Regardless of the lack of strength in depth of the squad, a more pressing concern for them may turn out to be the more established players. They have been lucky that, for example, Ryan Giggs has enjoyed an Indian summer that has lasted longer than anyone would have dared to hope, but Giggs isn’t getting any younger and neither are Paul Scholes or Gary Neville. Wayne Rooney is becoming the finished article as a striker, but Michael Owen seems unlikely to be a twenty-five goal per season striker again and Federico Macheda still needs a couple of years to prove that he can fulfil his undoubted potential.

Then, of course, there is the continuing enigma that is Dimitar Berbatov. Berbatov has started to attract a number of detractors this season, and it is easy to see why. His languid style of play is an easy target for those that choose to criticise him, especially considering the £32.5m that Manchester United paid for him. To date, he has managed fifteen goals in forty-nine goals for the club – not enough for a striker at a club that wins the majority of its matches. Whether he can – or will want to – change his style of play to suit his critics is debatable. Ultimately, though, Manchester United’s continuingly increasing depencence upon him is due to a lack of real quality in depth. To put it another way, there still seems to be a Cristiano Ronaldo-shaped hole at the heart of their current team.

Many of these problems can be attributed, whether directly or indirectly, to financial condition of the club. Over the last five years, Manchester United have had every conceivable financial advantage that a club could have. Massive prize money from continuing success in the Premier League and the Champions League. Capacity crowds of 76,000 for more or less every home match. One of the – if not the – most bankable brands in the global game. They paid £12m for Cristiano Ronaldo in 2003 and sold him for a world record transfer fee of £80m last year. Yet they start 2010 with question marks again being raised over their financial standing. The club itself insists that debt is not a problem because their profits cover the cost of the interest being accumulated against it, but the devil here is in the detail.

In 2008, Manchester United made a profit of £72m to be offset against annual interest costs of £69m. The implications of this are serious. Firstly, it means that one of the few properly profitable football clubs in the world is only just, in practical terms, managing to the balance the books. Secondly, it means that they need to keep performing at the same commercial level if they are to avoid a crisis. They have to keep getting to the latter stages of the Champions League. However, the corporate hospitality seats aren’t selling and a waiting queue for season tickets is a thing of the past after savage price increases over the last four years or so. With the interest rates at 14.25% per annum, they cannot afford – in a most literal sense – anything less than to be at the absolute top of the global leaderboard.

And all of this is without considering the moral considerations of it all. Where has the soul of Manchester United Football Club. A sizeable part of it is lodging in digs up the road at Gigg Lane. FC United of Manchester are not setting the Unibond League alight this season. They are third from bottom (one place above the relegation places) in the table but, having played just seventeen of their thirty-eight league matches so far this season, they are still only eleven points behind fifth placed Ashton United with six games in hand and a superior goal difference of thirteen. Plans are slowly moving forward towards a ground of their own. Those that turned away from this world of leveraged buy-outs, bond issues and hedge funds have had their rise from the North-West Counties League tempered over the last couple of seasons, but much of the original spirit of Old Trafford remains intact with them.

External factors may well be hitting Manchester United hard at the moment, but it is impossible to have any sympathy with owners that chose to play stock market rules to mortgage the club to the rooftops in order to acquire it. The club’s actual capital debt (around £700m) hasn’t even been touched – the big profits that have been being made have only been paying interest on this debt. Reducing the capital of the debt itself remains the question that no-one has been successfully been able to answer. Manchester United supporters who continue to look at the trophies that their club has won since the Glaser take-over as being proof that they have been successful should probably pause to consider what might have been possible had they had the extra money to spend that has already vanished into a vast pit with somebody else’s name written upon it. The decline and fall of Manchester United may been overstated and there is certainly a case to be made for saying that the soul of the club is ebbing away. Now, though, there is a chance that several altogether more practical chickens may be coming home to roost.



Ian began writing Twohundredpercent in May 2006. He lives in Brighton. He has also written for, amongst others, Pitch Invasion, FC Business Magazine, The Score, When Saturday Comes, Stand Against Modern Football and The Football Supporter. Ian was the first winner of the Socrates Award For Not Being Dead Yet at the 2010 NOPA awards for football bloggers.

  • January 4, 2010 at 11:55 pm


    Phenomenal take.

    The in-substitution of Ryan Giggs & Antonio Valencia at 57′ spoke loads of desperation.

  • January 5, 2010 at 2:31 am

    Micky F

    Poor old Man U, it’s such a shame to hear they’re struggling. Maybe the Blue Square Premier clubs could pass the hat round for them next saturday?

  • January 5, 2010 at 9:56 am

    Manchester United & The Need For Permanent Success | Twohundredpercent Mobile

    […] Manchester United & The Need For Permanent Success | Twohundredpercent Tags: club, current, despite-the-huge, greater-requirement, live, live-online, pitch, private, summit, the-pitch, very-excited, white-paper Join Me for the White Paper Success Summit | Small Business …Dominican President's year of success, scandals – DominicanToday.comSam Worthington fears unemployment despite 'Avatar' successPPC Advertising Success | Best Hot WebFinding Success Through the Love of Cats: Does Money Make You Happy?For the New Year: A Success ToolkitHealth Care Rationing in Virginia: A Success Story | FreedomWorksThe Success Principle – Reviews10 Steps to Financial Success in 2010 | Get Rich SlowlySusan Polgar Chess Daily News and Information: FCF success View the Contact Powered by Mobile […]

  • January 5, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    James Walker

    Well there are rumours that 6 far east businessmen are putting together a 1 billion takeover bid, As a Man Utd fan I pray this does happen or I fear in the long the run the club is doomed.

  • January 5, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    Gervillian Swike

    Good analysis. On the periphery of the article, I must just mention that it’s a strange moral position that FC United hold. Their situation is not the same as Wimbledon’s, whose club was taken over and shifted 80 miles up the road for other fans; this was a new club set up by disenfranchised Man United supporters. The image of the club is that of the plucky underdog, fightin for what is right for purely football reasons – and yet in setting up FC United, they’ve actually deprived other clubs in that area of support – the other team that plays at Gigg Lane, for example. It’s a strange irony that the popularity of a club set up for football reasons is so dependent on a brand image.

    Not a ccriticism, just an observation.

  • January 5, 2010 at 6:36 pm


    Just to let “Jish Inc” know, and for future reference, we don’t tolerate abusive replies on this site. There are plenty of other sites to visit if you want biased, uncritical eulogies to Manchester United. Don’t bang your arse on the way out.

  • January 5, 2010 at 6:46 pm

    Paul Blackwell

    This is all building up to a scenario – indeed a tragedy – in between 3 and 7 years time that will convulse the greedy self interested and blinkered upper echelons of the English game to their very foundations.
    It will be the final tragedy of Munich 58 – which let in Louis Edwards – who after the death of chairman Hardman picked off local shareholders – then his son took over – who started the whole process that ended up with the Glazers in control -aided along the way by Fergie’s spat with the Irishmen which alienated them from the club – Fergie’s spat of course aggravated by the nonsense behaviour of the posey boy phoney from Leytonstone – who now, laughably, is projected as the icon of the bid to stage 2018 in England despite having won sod all and arguably contributed to 3 successive World Cups of underachievements.
    My first match at Old Trafford was in 54 with Jack Rowley still there and Duncan Edwards about to blossom. When Albert Scanlon died last month that was so sad as he was a very early local hero.
    I last went to OT in 2004, probably for the last time.
    There is something very wrong and very rotten now about the game in this country.

  • January 5, 2010 at 8:15 pm

    Wyre Forest Red

    Gervillian Swike;

    You come across as a reasonable minded bloke. If so, please take 5 mins to read the report on how much FC-Utd did within the community last year… all done by volunteers. . Yes, our situation was not the same as Wimbledon, but the efforts we put into areas that are important to us are very similar.

    As for MUFC. This site alone has been willing to actually sift through the spin sent out by the PR men at OT for the last 5 years that the debt loaded onto the club is totally unsustainable. Only now is the mainstream media beginning to realise the crisis faced by United, by Liverpool and, for differing reasons, by a clutch of other Premier League clubs, West Ham and Porstmouth being the most obvious, I suspect tht their are several others.

  • January 5, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    Gervillian Swike

    Wyre Forest Red – thanks for the link, and I think there is some congratulations due for the excellent work carried out in the community by FCUOM. There is an irony that the profile of FCUOM is so much higher than that of clubs like Bury and Stockport, both of whom have had their problems in recent times – but there’s no doubt that this is being put to good use in the areas that matter.

    I wonder if there’s an article to be had on the progress of clubs like FC United, Wimbledon, AFC Liverpool, etc. all of which have different origins, constitutions, etc.?

  • January 11, 2010 at 12:30 pm

    Chris Taylor

    “and yet in setting up FC United, they’ve actually deprived other clubs in that area of support – the other team that plays at Gigg Lane, for example”

    How have we?

Leave A Comment

Also available on…
Socialise With Us