A World Cup Finals Without Argentina?

10 By Ian  |   The Ball  |   September 11, 2009  |     13

Now is not a particularly good time to be an Argentinian football supporter. Not only have their most loathed opposition – Brazil and England – already qualified for the finals of the 2010 World Cup, but there is a serious likelihood  that the Albiceleste themselves might not even qualify for next year’s tournament in South Africa, and coach Diego Maradona is receiving hitherto unprecedented criticism in his home country. Argentina haven’t failed to qualify for the World Cup finals since 1970, but with just two matches left to play they sit in fifth place in the CONMEBOL group (a position that would see them play off over two legs against the fourth placed North American team), and there aren’t even any guarantees that they will hold onto that lofty a position.

Eyebrows raised by the Argentinian Football Association’s decision to give the coach’s position to Diego Maradona were tempered by his status in the country. Maradona’s lengendary status has risen to the extent that he has become a one man cult in himself, and it seems likely that some have allowed his former abilities as a player to cloud their view of his status as a manager. What we know for certain is that his spell as the coach of the Argentina national side will be remembered as possibly the most disastrous in the recent history of the game in the country. Argentina, we should remember, started the last World Cup finals in Germany amongst the favourites to win the competition and even their quarter-final defeat at the hands of the hosts was considered to be something of a surprise. They remain a team packed with talented players, but shambolic recent performances have led to a team that looks rudderless and completely bereft of any confidence.

Last weekend they were beaten 3-1 at home by Brazil in Rosario. Brazil took the lead after twenty-three minutes when some woeful defending from a free-kick left Luisão completely unmarked, seven yards out to head the ball past the Argentine goalkeeper Mariano Andujar. The visitors doubled their lead seven minutes later when more rash tackling brought the Brazilians a free kick thirty-five yards from goal. Kaka’s optimistic free-kick was turned back into the path of Maicon. His shot was parried by Andujar but Luis Fabiano tapped the ball over the line from a couple of yards out with the home defence again standing around like statues. Argentina did pull a goal back midway through the second half through Jesus Datolo, but any hopes of a revival were dashed when Luis Fabiano ran onto a sumptuous through-ball from Kaka and chipped the ball over the onrushing Andujar to wrap the game up.

On Wednesday night, things went from bad to worse for Maradona and Argentina. Asuncion is a tricky place to visit for a World Cup qualifier at the best of times, and an Argentina team that looked little more orderly than it had at the weekend were sunk by a single first half goal from Borussia Dortmund’s Nélson Haedo Váldez. The result confirmed Paraguay’s qualification for the finals in second place behind Brazil, but has left Argentina with some soul searching to do before the final pair of matches, which are to be played over four days next month. On the tenth of October, they have a home match against Peru, who are currently bottom of the ten team group, but the following week they have to travel to Montevideo to play Uruguay in the final group match. Uruguay are in sixth place in the group, and travel to Ecuador (who are fourth) on the tenth. With only two points between these three sides (and Venezuela, who are seventh and on the same points as Uruguay), any two of the four sides could yet qualify.

At a post-Paraguay interview, Maradona said that, “”We’ve qualified via play-offs in the past and nobody died”, which is hardly a statement that fills anyone in Argentina with much confidence. The fourth place in the CONCACAF qualifying group is currently held by Costa Rica, but it could yet be Mexico that the fifth placed South Americans have to play – Mexico are currently second in the group, but are only three points above Costa Rica with two games left to play – or even, theoretically, the USA (although this would require the Americans to lose both of their remaining matches). On current form, though, even a play-off spot against Honduras or Costa Rica would by no means be a guarantee of a place in the finals. Argentina have now lost four of their last five matches, including a 6-1 defeat in Bolivia, a match which first drew attention to Maradona’s eccentricity when he didn’t send the players to La Paz early to acclimatise to the infamous thin air of the Estadio Hernando Siles Zuazo.

There are several likely reasons for Argentina’s fall from grace, but the buck ultimately stops with Maradona. Some of his team selections have bordered on the bizarre and lack of tactical acumen as a coach has been obvious from the very nature of some of the goals that Argentina have been conceding. Whilst the appeal of having him run the national team is obvious, but the old argument that “he was a great player, therefore he must be a great manager” is one of the oldest tricks in the football book to fall for, to an extent that it seems surprising that the AFA fell for it. It remains as likely as not that Argentina will still qualify for the World Cup finals, but it certainly seems that qualification will be merely papering over the cracks. Should they get there, what is the prognosis for what they will do in the finals if Maradona is still in charge with his current set up, and would they sack him if they qualify? These are tricky questions, and one fancies that Maradona’s ego will not like the answers very much.



Ian began writing Twohundredpercent in May 2006. He lives in Brighton. He has also written for, amongst others, Pitch Invasion, FC Business Magazine, The Score, When Saturday Comes, Stand Against Modern Football and The Football Supporter. Ian was the first winner of the Socrates Award For Not Being Dead Yet at the 2010 NOPA awards for football bloggers.

  • September 11, 2009 at 2:33 pm


    What a shame ! We’ll sorely miss them !

    (Did I sound genuine? I hope not)

  • September 11, 2009 at 3:34 pm


    I’d miss them: my favourite South American team for more than twenty years.

    Pero no extrañaría la ignorancia inglesa.

  • September 11, 2009 at 7:01 pm

    Gervillian Swike

    I’d miss them too. When Argentina play in the world cup, there’s real excitement, real drama. I’m afraid I find the Brazilian procession against the weaker teams, only to revert to a far more prosaic style against the stronger ones, quite uninspiring – although my anitpathy towards them might have more to do with those dreary montages we always see of the Brazilian crowd doing a conga, Carlos Alberto, and some idiot with no imagination shouting, “Goooooooooooooooooooooal”.

    I surely can’t be the only one!!

  • September 11, 2009 at 7:36 pm

    Michael Wood

    Open Question: Is it harder for a “great” player to become a great manager than it is for a simply “good” player to become a great manager?

  • September 12, 2009 at 11:29 am

    Gervillian Swike

    Well there seems to be some evidence to suggest that. I think George Best once said it was almost impossible because what makes a great player great is almost instinctive, so it’s impossible to re-create that in other players, and it’s frustrating to see players that you are coaching unable to reach your own standards. Glenn Hoddle was famously frustrated as England manager with David Beckham for example. Beckenbauer, Cruyff and Platini were successful to a degree, and Dalglish was for a while too – but it seems to be those who are good players within a decent team who are then able to coach successfully, and to adapt to changing styles – Ferguson, George Graham before him, Capello, for example.

  • September 12, 2009 at 11:55 am

    Lanterne Rouge

    I don’t think there are any rules. Beckenbauer, Cruyff and Platini always showed composure on the pitch and a degree of intelligence – Frank Rijkaard is another who made the transition reasonably successfully – although one side effect is that these very rich men have often bailed out of management earlier than one might have hoped. They didn’t need to stick around once the barbs started flying.

    Without being wise after the event, Maradona never looked to have the mentality to be a manager – he’s more of a street fighter and one of the lads. England’s nearest equivalent would have been to put Gazza in charge of the national team!

    Out of interest, was Pele ever a manager?

  • September 14, 2009 at 7:34 pm

    A World Cup Finals Without Argentina? « Scissors Kick

    […] A World Cup Finals Without Argentina? 1930 World Cup Final ball Argentina “Now is not a particularly good time to be an Argentinian football supporter. Not only have their most loathed opposition – Brazil and England – already qualified for the finals of the 2010 World Cup, but there is a serious likelihood that the Albiceleste themselves might not even qualify for next year’s tournament in South Africa, and coach Diego Maradona is receiving hitherto unprecedented criticism in his home country.” (twohundredpercent) […]

  • September 14, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    Albert Ross

    A few years ago I read Leo McKinstry’s “Jack and Bobby” about the Charlton Brothers, and in some ways it highlighted some of the issues about management: the game came naturally to Bobby, and he didn’t have to think too hard about what he did. Jack, a more limited player, had to work harder and think harder to maximise his talent – and got involved with coaching and tactics much earlier as a result. No surprise then as to which one had more success as a manager.

    It isn’t impossible for a top player to become a top manager of course, but I’d suggest that the ones that do it best are those who not only have the talent as players but have shown signs during their career of being a step or two ahead tactically and strategically. The current trend for top players to transition straight away to managing top sides or even nations is a bit like throwing mud at a wall and hoping some of it sticks IMO – particularly when they’re being plunged into roles where coaching is only part of their remit.

  • September 19, 2009 at 9:31 am

    how to train a puppy

    Really hard to believe initially. But players from other countries played very well.

  • May 2, 2010 at 11:19 pm

    Headphone Reviews

    This is actually a very common problem with superstar performers. They are promoted to manage a team and they suck! Too bad, Maradona was one of my favorite players.

Leave A Comment

Also available on…
Speek Yo Branes
Socialise With Us