Collateral Damage, Sheffield United & The Ched Evans Case

8 By Ian  |   The Ball  |   April 23, 2012  |     18

Having been around or about the League One automatic promotion places for much of the season, the last few days have suddenly become rather uncomfortable for Sheffield United. A single goal defeat in Milton Keynes at the weekend coupled with a home win for local and promotion rivals Sheffield Wednesday cut the gap between second and third place in the table to a single point with just two games left to play, but even this precarious state of affairs is now threatening to be overshadowed by events off the pitch. 

Sheffield United striker Ched Evans had been having a good season on the pitch for his team this season having scored thirty-five goals for his club, but events away from it have rendered them something of an irrelevance. Evans was imprisoned for five years at the end of last week for the rape of a nineteen year old woman in a hotel in North Wales last year. The victim had, according to testimony heard, been too drunk to give consent to sex, and Evans’ jail sentence was awarded as another player, Clayton McDonald of Port Vale, was acquitted of the same offence.

The verdict awarded against Evans seems to have split the Blades’ fan base, with a schism having appeared between those who feel that the judgement must be adhered to and those who feel that a miscarriage of justice has been committed. The Twitter hash-tag “#JusticeForChed” began appearing over the weekend. It is not the place of this site to comment upon the intricacies of a criminal case about which we simply do not know the full story and possibly never will, but this reaction – and the way in which it manifested itself – certainly does warrant comment.

It did not take very long before the name of the victim of Evans’ crime was being openly circulated, in clear breach of the anonymity orders awarded in favour of the victims of sexual offences, along with a number of other messages implying that this particular rape victime somehow deserved her fate that night. It would be unsurprising to see a string of arrests regarding this over the course of the next few days or so. Just as appallingly, a relatively large number of people seem to have decided that not only is Evans innocent of the crime that he has been convicted, but also that the victim of this crime’s character should be assassinated by an online kangaroo court of individuals that have picked up on a couple of rumours and added two plus two to make an astronomically high number.

Getting involved in speculation about the rights or wrongs of the verdict reached by the jury is not something that we are going to do with regard to this case. As much as we can say on this matter is that an individual has been found guilty by a jury of his peers, based upon the evidence heard. Due legal process makes provision for Evans to be able to appeal the verdict of the court, and we will have to wait and see whether he decides to go through with this. In legal terms, however, much as we have to presume somebody to be innocent until guilty prior to a trial, after it we can only reasonably consider the pendulum to have swung in the opposite direction – in other words, Evans now has to be considered guilty until he proves his innocence.

Laws surrounding the anonymity of the victims of sexual crimes, however, are a different matter. Such laws are in place for good reasons , and those that have sought to implicate the victim in this case – whether they understand the gravity of breaching such orders or not – may well find out how seriously they are enforced the hard way. In the case of the Swansea University student Liam Stacey, who was imprisoned for eight weeks for tweets sent in the aftermath of Fabrice Muamba’s collapse during the match between Tottenham Hotspur and Bolton Wanderers, the judge that sentenced Stacey made it clear that he was seeking to send out a message to those seemingly of the opinion that social media is a place where the rule of law doesn’t apply that this isn’t the case.

We don’t know at this stage how many of those that have been distributing their poison on this subject over the last day or two using the likes of Facebook and Twitter are Sheffield United supporters, but it doesn’t seem unreasonable to guess that at least a proportion of them are, and this situation is now putting the club in an unenviable position. It is duty-bound to support any player that finds himself in this position until the jury has reached its verdict, but the question of what the club should do now is not easily answered. Evans is out of contract in the summer so, even if he has the grounds to appeal that might end in him being found not guilty in the fullness of time, will the club chance its arm and offer him an extension when it is unlikely that any appeal will have been seen through to its conclusion by the time he becomes, in football terms at least, a free agent?

In pure footballing terms, after all, Evans could be a valuable asset, having scored thirty-five goals for the team this season. This, however, has to be weighed up against the moral aspect of offering a lucrative contract to somebody who is a convicted rapist at the time of writing. Ultimately, the question of if or when the club might choose to wash their hands of him is one that only the club can answer itself. The damage to the club may also be seen in other, less obviously tangible ways. We may never be able to definitively determine the extent to which the news of this conviction disrupted the team’s preparations for last weekend’s match, but we know for sure that this match, a win from which would have made automatic promotion a near certainty, was lost and that this is the worst possible time for any distractions to come about.

It would be absurd to blame the club itself for the situation in which it finds itself today regarding this subject or to identify all supporters of Sheffield United FC as seeking to trivialise the seriousness of the original offence, tar the name of its victim or otherwise consider the tribalism of football support to be more important than the original offence that was brought before the court. Indeed, many Blades supporters have written very eloquently on forums and elsewhere of the unease that this entire situation has left them in. We should also pause for a moment to consider Evans’ girlfriend and family, further collateral victims of his behaviour that night. Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the legal aspects of this case, they have also been publicly shamed by someone that they should have been able to trust.

Those that would seek to debase and attempt to discredit the victim of such a serious crime as rape would do well to remember in identifying her they are, regardless of the merits or otherwise of this case, breaking the law and possibly even doing Evans’ case for an appeal more harm than good. After all, what chance is there of a fair retrial if this sort of response to the conviction continues? Moreover, this misguided behaviour only seems likely to damage the reputation of the club itself to a far greater extent than the original verdict ever would. Hearsay and innuendo have no basis in law, but solid facts do and the only solid fact of this case that matters at present is that this player was found guilty by a jury of his peers of a serious criminal offence. It is an experience that some of those that have been expressing their swivel-eyed outrage on the internet over the last couple of days might well get to experience themselves over the next few days or weeks.

Readers are reminded that comments that we consider to be defamatory or otherwise inappropriate will be deleted.

You can follow Twohundredpercent on Twitter by clicking here.



Ian began writing Twohundredpercent in May 2006. He lives in Brighton. He has also written for, amongst others, Pitch Invasion, FC Business Magazine, The Score, When Saturday Comes, Stand Against Modern Football and The Football Supporter. Ian was the first winner of the Socrates Award For Not Being Dead Yet at the 2010 NOPA awards for football bloggers.

  • April 23, 2012 at 2:20 pm

    Jeremy Gilmour

    Although I deplore the fact that people have been “spreading their poison” as you so delecately phrase it you really have to see the whole context of this. You are correct that people should not vent their spleen on twiter but people have been given the whole trial on twitter minute by minute, had a massive vested interest in the outcome, have heard all the evidence available to them and are in the typical SARA phase of an major incident. I have gone through the first phase of SARA as in Shock and the Anger was on Saturday when the Blades lost I still had feelings that it couldn’t have happened (Rejection) but am now moving to Acceptance. Which if you look at more and more postings on the net thats where most people associated with the Blades are. I refrained from posting my feelings but some obviously wanted others to share their feelings or search for other like minded people. To just call them names is a bit moronic and demonstrates a staggering lack of empathy. I am a Blades fan but didn’t lash out on twitter but having seen everything that transpired I fully understand why others compelled themselves to do so even if I don’t condone it. I wouldn’t call them names for it but try to understand why people felt strongly enough to do it. If you are a football person who has just seen their star player go through this, essentially destroying your entire season from one of sucess to that of failure then surely you can understand the emotion? My final words are for those of the girl who IS the victim. Chedwyn has been found guilty of rape and is due to start his prison sentence. I hope that justice gives her some peace, although it must be aweful for her to have this go through the courts in the glare of publicity, and to have it happen to her, I hope she now can move on in her life which is going to be very difficult for her.

  • April 23, 2012 at 5:36 pm


    ‘I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth’ – unfortunately in this case the state only wants us to tell the truth that it considers appropriate.

  • April 23, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    Philip Dobson

    A thoughtful analysis. Thank you

  • April 26, 2012 at 11:12 am

    The Lower League Fortnight - The Up and Down Edition | Born Offside

    […] of her name on TV.There’s been some very thoughtful and considered opinions I’ve seen, from a neutral (the always excellent TwoHundredPercent) a Sheffield United (A United View) and a female POV […]

  • April 26, 2012 at 7:36 pm


    The part of this unfortunate situation that i’m struggling with is that if evans was convicted then surely macdonald goes down too, i followed the trial and could find nothing which seperated the two defendants, surely if the lady involved was too drunk to consent to one, then she was also too drunk to consent to the other? So either they’re both guilty, or both innocent…

    Can anyone explain this?

  • April 29, 2012 at 9:30 pm


    Can anyone explain this?

    Why are so many men on commenting on this case finding this hard to fathom?Its disturbing.

    I can’t believe I have to explain this but here goes. Consenting to one man does not automatically mean consenting to another who decides to turn up. There.

    If you have sex with a girl does that give your mate the right to have sex with her after, whether or not she agrees to it??? I think you already knew the answer to your question.

    The victim as per the news reports regarding the case, asked to go back with, and got in a taxi with, McDonald and (with evidence 90% of which we are not privy to) the judge and jury found her to have consented.

    Evans, randomly turned up later, having tricked hotel reception into getting a keycard to get into the room without being invited in, and the girl (again judged to not have consented on evidence 90% of which has not been reported, and video evidence of the encounter filmed on a phone), is judeged not to have consented to Evans.

    Do you know how hard it is to get a rape conviction and sentence? That fact that this case ended in one suggests concrete reasons,possibly via the video evidence, that the girl was in no fit state/aware to consent by the time Evans arrived.

    Either way we can all have our viewpoint and assumptions but a jury and court of the land have had all of the evidence before them and judged the situation, randoms on the internet, me and you included, are probably less well placed to assume they know better.

  • May 31, 2012 at 1:14 pm


    Surely McDonald was at least guilty of allowing the girl to be raped by ched Evans. (is this not a criminal offence)
    Justice is not always right you know.
    I no of at least 5 people who have been imprisoned wrongly.
    The justice system dosent always work.

  • October 16, 2012 at 7:28 pm

    Sufc roobz

    #freeched #justiceforched

Leave A Comment

Also available on…
Speek Yo Branes
Socialise With Us