Enter Stephanie Booth At Wrexham


Ian began writing Twohundredpercent in May 2006. He lives in Brighton. He has also written for, amongst others, Pitch Invasion, FC Business Magazine, The Score, When Saturday Comes, Stand Against Modern Football and The Football Supporter. Ian was the first winner of the Socrates Award For Not Being Dead Yet at the 2010 NOPA awards for football bloggers.

You may also like...

9 Responses

  1. ian says:

    Frustrating isn’t it?

  2. Ian says:

    Indeed. Just for the purposes of clarification, we have checked this morning and the information showing for Ms Booth is genuine. I cannot offer an explanation for the comments attributed to Companies House in the Daily Post this morning.

  3. Martin says:

    Surely you should be looking forward to the “clean break” that this might represent?….

  4. Mark Barnes says:

    The reason for the Daily Post’s comments are that there are two types of disqualification: a “disqualification undertaking” and a “disqualification order”. The first is voluntary, the second is imposed by the court. Stephanie Booth claims to be voluntarily agreed to disqualification; if that’s true, it means that technically she’s subject to a “disqualification undertaking” rather than a court order. (It amounts to the same thing, however.)

    As there’s not a direct quote from Companies House to back-up the Post’s statement, I can only assume that they asked too specific a question, which didn’t take into account the possibility of a “disqualification undertaking”.

    Either way, it’s important to understand that the FA treats “disqualification undertakings” in the same way as “disqualification orders”. Stephen Vaughan at Chester, was disqualified as a consequence of an undertaking, for example.

  5. Ian says:

    Thanks for that, Mark. I was in the middle of seeking clarification over this.

    So, to be clear: presuming that this is the case, Stephanie Booth would not be able to own a shareholding of over 30% in the club until after the end of her disqualification period OR (and that is in capitals because of its relevance) act as a company director until after 27-02-12.

  6. Mark Barnes says:


    Supporters Direct have now issued a report, confirming that in their view Booth would not currently be a “fit and proper person”: http://clients.squareeye.com/uploads/sd/WrexhamFCReportforLGIL.pdf

  1. March 1, 2011

    […] board – Official Another good article from Two Hundred Percent on the latest developments: Another Chaotic Week At Wrexham Twohundredpercent The supporters of the club, as we mentioned on here last week, seem unlikely to be in favour of […]

  2. March 1, 2011

    […] […]

  3. March 1, 2011

    […] […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>